Tuesday, March 8, 2011

5 photos (Metacognitation) & Questions (beginning)


Thinking about your Guide Photos and your "Introduction"

  1. I plan to take photo's of people in the middle of deep thought. I'll work to capture the specific moment in time when people are in a day dream haze. Not only are these people day dreaming but are unconsciously contemplating and "taking in" their world around them and evolving personal perceptions without even realizing it; this is called Meta-cognition.
  2. The photo of Stieglitz milk bottle on the fire escape identifies a subtle aspect of contemplation. Instead of using people, his use of objects show his process of thinking. Taking a picture and placing the bottles on the fire escape with buildings of other fire escapes in the background is his own meaning of realization, compelling a simple yet distinct beauty of everyday life. The camera angel also suggests his view of awareness approaching the image he is trying to portray. Stieglitz really idolizes this scene because his view is thought out with a casual comforting feel to the naked eye- it does capture how the photographer (Stieglitz) value/interests rub off on the photograph, and how the actual context and material  makeup of what is being shown represents importance and gilded beauty.
  3. The difference of Stieglitz beauty that is shown in the milk bottle/fire escape photo compared to a sunset by an ocean is that Stieglitz view is more of a subtle analytical beauty instead of a the sunsets prominent/straight forward beauty. Stieglitz intentions are to identify a scene that COULD be beautiful to the naked eye if given the chance to be noticed as so; instead of the familiarity of beauty in a sunset setting over a calm ocean. Both images hold a bold and meaningful statement of their own in which is up to the viewer to analyze, except, follow as something uniquely beautiful depending on the setting.
  4. Walker Evens beliefs are similar to my own. He is a man that saw the reaction, expression, human existence of others when in their deepest trance of thought. I find this very fascinating because we all do it whether we're conscious of it or not, most of the time its a day dream that turns into a form of realization or (my favorite phrase) meta-cognition. Capturing people off guard in a photograph is an example of "pictures say a thousand words"; because of this idea, the viewer has to read a persons feeling through expressive detail. The viewer may not know WHAT the person is directly thinking but can understand the context of the "message" being sent and translated. Brassi is a famous photographer and declares the belief that trapping subjects off guard, "in the erroneous belief that something special will be revealed about them." (Susan Sontag, Pg 36-37).
  5. Diane Arbus intentions to "befriend" "freaks of nature" was an experiment for her own personal intrest. She realized that these "freaks" are the people of society who ACCEPT their odd ways and embrace it. To Diane Arbus, these people showed her a whole new world of reality- aside from the reality she was USED to living. Arbus quoted, "one of the things I felt I suffered from as a kid was that I never felt adversity. I was confined in a sense of reality...And the sense of being immune was, ludicrous as it seems, a painful one." Adversity is "a condition marked my misfortune", to Arbus her neieveness amongst this issue was her pain. Taking photographs of these individuals of adversity, "freaks", made her recognize, for herself, the unnoticed people of society and differences that they bring to society, instead of following the "status quo" of beauty and nobleness of society's social norm.
  6. I hope to have my viewer understand the concept of meta-cognition and consider it as a way to "reveal" an emotional inception upon themselves and others. Not only do I hope for this, I inspire, recommend people to look though the eyes of others and to have a better understanding of the world around them, in bettering their own perceptions as maturing individuals.
  7. I want my relationship between the subjects and myself to be comfortable and serene. I want my subjects to feel as though they can honestly express themselves to me the same way they would if i weren't present taking their photograph. I am willing to be open minded and talk to them before, so they understand my true intentions are based off an appropriate level instead of a forceful photo shoot. I want to admittedly capture the fertile feeling hidden beneath the surface the person.
  8. Depending of the message that the specific photographer is trying to get across, having actual people in a photo does add characterize to  the photograph in sending a "message". Viewers than can relate or criticize each other to analyze on a deeper level to understand the image better.
  9.  I believe it is important to have BOTH large scale and close up scales, because it gives importance to the photographer in having more options to expand his/her meaning of their topic, message, idea. However, depending on the actual message, specific scales may be appropriate for that use theme.

Monday, March 7, 2011

American Seen Through Photographs, Darkly By Susan Sontag- Keypoints/ Questions




Professional Photographers Mentioned & Compared

Walt Whitman, Walker Evans, James Agee, Diane Arbus, Edward Steichen, Stieglitz, Paul Rosenfield, Sylivia Path, Riech, Hine, Brassai, Paul Morriessey, Weegee, Robert Frank, Giorgio Morandi

Walk Whitman- Discrimination between beauty and ugliness photography
Actual American experience
All Facts- Incandescent

Edward Steichen (1915)
-        Milk bottle/fire escape photo = beauty
1920s Professionals followed his plain, tawdry, vapid material

“Reach precise object or condition or combination or process exhibits a beauty… All that a person does or think is of consequence.” (Whitman)

- Meaning of photograph can be altered
>> (Magazines/celeberty/cataloqued)

>> NO moment is more important than any other moment; no person is more interesting than any other person

Whitman according to Sontag…
>> Was generalizing beauty instead of abolishing it.

“Whitmanesque Vision” ~ now Surrism?

Whitman believed that Americans focus in photography was becoming more complex…hiding reality instead of announcing it.
>>>> 
Walker Evan came along and brought back serious topics of Humanism that are idealistically beautiful in a refreshing authentic way.

Pg 31…
Walker Evans is trying to let people see and feel that photography is a way to bring people together though realizations of photographs meaning/cause/development/ purpose.

Pg 32…
(1955) Races, ages, classes, phycial types… “ In Family of Men” by Edward Steichen
Humanity is “one” and that of human beings

Historical understandings of Reality…
Steichen Vs. Arbus
Beauty Vs. Ugly
>> One being chosen over the other defenestrates societies realistic interests…shallow?... selfish?...naive?

Boredom Vs. Fascination
Beauty Vs. Ugliness
Success Vs. Failure


Sontag brings up/Mentions…
Arbus efforts to capture the ideal stereotype of an appalling image, people that except their differences and rebel attitude to another world of reality.
Ex. “Freaks of Nature”

>>Photographers gain confidence in approaching/associating with people different than themselves.

Arbus photographs people despite their state of unconscious or unaware relation to their (own) pain, their ugliness.
>>Meaning; she takes pictures of people’s weaknesses and focus’s on that nature to capture their reality and for the viewer to see.
>>Shows these people “freaks” as cheerful, self accepting- matters of fact – subjects of reality in the photographs.

Pg 38…
Diane Arbus suicide 1971
>> Sontag suggests that her death makes her photographs more meaningful/sincere.
Proves/shows that she took her photography very seriously and how the photos have been dangerous to her mental capacity.

Pg 40…
“The photographer (Arbus) once had to say to herself, Okay, I can accept that; the viewer is invited to make the same declaration” (Sontag).

Pg 41…
“Photography was a license to go wherever I wanted and to do what I wanted to do” (Arbus).

I agree and strongly relate to Arbus’s feeling’s of…
“One of the things I felt I suffered from as a kid was that I never felt adversity. I was confined in a sense of reality… And the sense of being immune was, ludicrous as it seems, a painful one.”
>> That I as an individual has had grown up around such a secured/protected/sheltered life that reality (going off to college) has become such a reality check to me, it goes for most college students. I become more and more worried what else will be revealed to me, and now look back and wished that I were more willing to be open to taking others advice- such as my parents, strangers, friends, extended family, teachers.
>> I also have seen people’s lives less convenient than my own and I feel compelled to have sympathy for them and to value my life even more as I do each day because of the opportunities and advantages I have over those who don’t.